Live
BREAKING: Civic Order Coalition launches $2M ad campaign labeling REA a 'domestic terrorist threat'DEVELOPING: Autonomous Collective's open letter 'Amber Is the New Blue' goes viral — 2M+ views in 12 hoursALERT: Retired U.S. Marshal's op-ed 'The REA Exists Because We Failed' becomes most-shared article in Dead Drop historyUPDATE: CBS News/YouGov poll: 47% of moderates view REA 'somewhat favorably' — higher than liberals (41%) or conservatives (23%)JUST IN: Nine members of Congress join COC call to classify REA as domestic terrorist organizationBREAKING: Portland PD chief announces 'review of protest engagement protocols' following Saturday demonstrationDEVELOPING: Second Maricopa County deputy placed on administrative leave amid 'ongoing review'ALERT: Milwaukee Alderman Brennan cancels scheduled press conference, citing 'family emergency'REPORT: Three more cities report amber-patch sightings at public demonstrations this weekendVERIFIED: @signal_received remains silent since COC launch — longest gap since account creationUPDATE: ACLU calls COC's proposed Public Safety Protection Act 'unconstitutional on its face'JUST IN: Anonymous website hosts new document dump — 340 pages of internal affairs records from unnamed departmentBREAKING: Civic Order Coalition launches $2M ad campaign labeling REA a 'domestic terrorist threat'DEVELOPING: Autonomous Collective's open letter 'Amber Is the New Blue' goes viral — 2M+ views in 12 hoursALERT: Retired U.S. Marshal's op-ed 'The REA Exists Because We Failed' becomes most-shared article in Dead Drop historyUPDATE: CBS News/YouGov poll: 47% of moderates view REA 'somewhat favorably' — higher than liberals (41%) or conservatives (23%)JUST IN: Nine members of Congress join COC call to classify REA as domestic terrorist organizationBREAKING: Portland PD chief announces 'review of protest engagement protocols' following Saturday demonstrationDEVELOPING: Second Maricopa County deputy placed on administrative leave amid 'ongoing review'ALERT: Milwaukee Alderman Brennan cancels scheduled press conference, citing 'family emergency'REPORT: Three more cities report amber-patch sightings at public demonstrations this weekendVERIFIED: @signal_received remains silent since COC launch — longest gap since account creationUPDATE: ACLU calls COC's proposed Public Safety Protection Act 'unconstitutional on its face'JUST IN: Anonymous website hosts new document dump — 340 pages of internal affairs records from unnamed department
Tracked by Bureau Editors
Breaking/February 13, 2026

FBI 'Aware of' REA Activity But Has Not Opened Formal Investigation, Sources Say

Bureau officials describe the group as 'novel' and 'difficult to classify' under existing frameworks.

J. Deckard

National desk editor. If it bleeds policy, it leads.

6 min19,340 views
See on Board
A federal field office in an undisclosed city. Multiple sources within the Bureau confirm awareness of REA activities.

A federal field office in an undisclosed city. Multiple sources within the Bureau confirm awareness of REA activities.

The Dead Drop

Two sources with knowledge of FBI deliberations say the Bureau is "aware of and monitoring" the group calling itself the Rights Enforcement Agency, but has not opened a formal investigation or assigned a threat classification.

The sources, both of whom spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter, described a degree of internal confusion about how to categorize the group.

"The problem is, nothing they've done so far is clearly illegal," said one source. "Standing at a protest is First Amendment activity. Sending someone their own personnel file — that might be stolen property, but you'd have to prove how they got it. And the body cam footage? If someone inside the department leaked it, that's a whistleblower issue, not a domestic terrorism issue."

The second source was more blunt: "They're doing what oversight boards are supposed to do. That's uncomfortable for a lot of people in this building."

The FBI declined to comment on the record.

The lack of a formal investigation does not mean the Bureau is idle. According to the first source, analysts at the Domestic Terrorism Operations Unit have prepared an initial assessment of the group, but it has not been approved for broader distribution. "It's in a gray area," the source said. "There are people here who think we should be all over this and people who think opening a case would be a political nightmare."

The political dimension is significant. Several members of Congress have already weighed in on the REA's emergence, with opinions breaking along predictable lines. Rep. David Lamont (R-TX) called the group "a vigilante threat that must be dismantled," while Sen. Ayanna Brooks (D-MA) said it was "a symptom of a law enforcement accountability crisis that Congress has refused to address."

For now, the FBI appears content to watch and wait. But the pace of REA-attributed actions — four incidents in two weeks across three states — suggests that waiting may not be an option for much longer.

fbifederalinvestigationrea

Discussion (4)

FedWatcher@fedwatch_dcFeb 13
If the FBI can't classify them, that's by design. They built something that exists in the gap between protected activity and criminal conduct. That's extremely deliberate.
amber_patch@signal_receivedFeb 13
They are watching. We know. We always knew. The question was never whether they would look. The question is what they'll see.
signal detected
[REDACTED]@field_office_7Feb 14
I can't say much. I won't say much. But I can tell you that the Bureau's internal assessment and the public statement are two different documents. The one you read in this article is the press-friendly version. The other one has a classification marking I'm not going to type here. They know more than they're saying. The question is why they're sitting on it. Don't look for me. I'll post when I can.
Hank Voss@bunker_protocolFeb 14
Been saying this for 15 years. Nobody listened. When the federal government refuses to classify something, it means one of two things: they genuinely don't know what they're dealing with, or they know exactly what they're dealing with and classification would require a response they're not prepared to make. Either way, you're on your own. You always were. I'll be posting a preparedness guide for subscribers this week. Not because I think the sky is falling. Because the people who built the roof never planned for this kind of weather.